Показать сообщение отдельно
  #467  
Старый 17.11.2010, 14:05
Аватар для Chevychelov
Chevychelov Chevychelov вне форума ВРАЧ
Ветеран форума
      
 
Регистрация: 09.09.2006
Город: Тирасполь
Сообщений: 2,244
Сказал(а) спасибо: 73
Поблагодарили 163 раз(а) за 140 сообщений
Записей в дневнике: 54
Chevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форумеChevychelov этот участник имеет превосходную репутацию на форуме
Trial Summary BASKET-PROVE
Title: Basal Stent Kosten-Effektivitats Trial‒Prospective Validation Examination
Trial Sponsor: Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation, and Swiss National Foundation for Research
Year Presented: 2010
Year Published: 2010
Topic(s): Interventional Cardiology, General Cardiology, Prevention/Vascular
Summary Posted: 11/16/2010
Writer: Anthony A. Bavry, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.C.
Author Disclosure: NOTHING TO DISCLOSE
Reviewer: Deepak L. Bhatt, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.C.
Reviewer Disclosure: RESEARCH/RESEARCH GRANTS: Astra Zeneca(SIGNIFICANT), Eisai(SIGNIFICANT), Sanofi Aventis(SIGNIFICANT), The Medicines Company(SIGNIFICANT), Ethicon(SIGNIFICANT), Bristol Myers Squibb(SIGNIFICANT), Heartscape(SIGNIFICANT), Cogentus(NONE), PLx Pharma(NONE), Takeda(NONE)

Description:

The goal of the trial was to compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents among patients with coronary artery disease.
Hypothesis:

Adverse cardiovascular outcomes will be similar between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.
Drugs/Procedures Used:

Patients undergoing coronary artery disease were randomized to sirolimus-eluting stents (n = 775), everolimus-eluting stents (n = 774), or bare-metal stents (n = 765).
Concomitant Medications:

Aspirin 75-100 mg daily indefinitely and clopidogrel 75 mg daily for 1 year
Principal Findings:
Overall, 2,314 patients were randomized. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between participants. In the sirolimus-eluting stent group, the mean age was 66 years, 26% were women, 18% had diabetes, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) was present in 34%, and mean total stent length per patient was 30 mm. The proportion of patients on aspirin and clopidogrel at 1 year was 82% and at 2 years was 19%.

The primary outcome, death from cardiac causes or nonfatal MI, was 2.6% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, 3.2% in the everolimus-eluting stent group, and 4.8% in the bare-metal stent group (p = 0.13 for sirolimus-eluting vs. bare-metal stents and p = 0.37 for everolimus-eluting vs. bare-metal stents).

Target vessel revascularization occurred in 4.3% of the sirolimus-eluting stent group, 3.7% of the everolimus-eluting stent group, and 10.3% of the bare-metal stent group (p = 0.005 for sirolimus-eluting vs. bare-metal stents and p = 0.002 for everolimus-eluting vs. bare-metal stents). Cardiac death occurred in 1.7%, 1.7%, and 2.9% (p = NS), nonfatal MI occurred in 0.9%, 1.7%, and 2.6% (p = NS), and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0.4%, 0.3%, and 0.8% (p = NS), respectively, for sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, and bare-metal stents.
Interpretation:

Among patients undergoing PCI with a 3-4 mm diameter stent, there was no difference in the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI between drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. Sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents were associated with reduced need for long-term revascularization (~4% rate) compared with bare-metal stents (~10% rate). Stent thrombosis was similar between stent types. Compliance with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy was high, which may have contributed to lower than expected cardiovascular outcomes. This reduced the ability of the trial to detect a difference in cardiovascular outcomes between treatment groups. Another limitation of the trial is that one-third of events were adjudicated in a nonblinded fashion.
Study Design:
Randomized. Parallel.
Primary Endpoints:
Death from cardiovascular cause or nonfatal MI at 2 years
Secondary Endpoints:
Target vessel revascularization
Stent thrombosis
Patient Population:
Patients with acute or chronic coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with a 3-4 mm diameter stent

Number of screened applicants: 2,323
Number of enrollees: 2,314
Duration of follow-up: Median 2 years
Mean patient age: 66 years
Percentage female: 26%
Exclusions:
Cardiogenic shock
Treatment of in-stent restenosis or thrombosis
Unprotected left main PCI
Bypass graft stenosis
Anticipated surgery within 12 months
Need for anticoagulation
Increased risk for bleeding
Noncompliance to long-term antiplatelet therapy
References:

Kaiser C, Galatius S, Erne P, et al. Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 2010;Nov 16:[Epub ahead of print].

Presented by Dr. Christoph Kaiser at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, Chicago, IL, November 16, 2010.
Ответить с цитированием